as an obsessed follower of the AV robotaxi revolution its nice to see someone with sufficient knowledge to be credibly authoritative.
as a substantial TSLA owner I have an inevitable +bias for Musk and Cybercab/Robotaxi. My deep curiosity is my constant due diligence of "Is my. investment still a good safe bet" . and I still can't find a scaleable veritable competitor in the Robotaxi Space. IMO Tesla are executing with a Paranoid emphasis on safety because they know the Worlds press are searching for a feeding time of failure.
which brings me to my challenge. "4 Crashes" ? there have been 2 recorded tiny contacts/bumps neither which invoked any damage.
the assertion that there is recorded injury is incorrect - please support with evidence. Google will ditch Waymo because they don't want to be a Car Manufacture .
Depreciation of Capex CAN minimise the Calculation of CPM but not Capital Required to Scale or Balance sheet impacts.
Uber are facing an existential threat as they too don't make cars and 50/60/70 cents per mile, which is the end game PPM, must be driverless. It is indeed the dawn of a revolution. It's a "Winner takes most" disruptive novelty . there will be casualties. I will back the Winner with real investment and at the moment I cannot find an argument for any real competitive contender beyond Tesla.
Lucent make cars, Nuro and NVIDIA make bolt on bits . In Time they will overcome the Board crisis of Not inveneted here. Saudi PIF will ( maybe) keep providing money, so they may prevail but I'm not sure they have th eingediants to be that Winner which takes most.
I am curious about the motives of Forbes in their constant attempts to devalue Musk & Tesla, it is so intense at times they genuinely do compromise the value of the Forbes brand......WHY?
Comments
Jeremy Cooke
Fri, 2025-10-31 08:10
Permalink
great coverage
as an obsessed follower of the AV robotaxi revolution its nice to see someone with sufficient knowledge to be credibly authoritative.
as a substantial TSLA owner I have an inevitable +bias for Musk and Cybercab/Robotaxi. My deep curiosity is my constant due diligence of "Is my. investment still a good safe bet" . and I still can't find a scaleable veritable competitor in the Robotaxi Space. IMO Tesla are executing with a Paranoid emphasis on safety because they know the Worlds press are searching for a feeding time of failure.
which brings me to my challenge. "4 Crashes" ? there have been 2 recorded tiny contacts/bumps neither which invoked any damage.
the assertion that there is recorded injury is incorrect - please support with evidence. Google will ditch Waymo because they don't want to be a Car Manufacture .
Depreciation of Capex CAN minimise the Calculation of CPM but not Capital Required to Scale or Balance sheet impacts.
Uber are facing an existential threat as they too don't make cars and 50/60/70 cents per mile, which is the end game PPM, must be driverless. It is indeed the dawn of a revolution. It's a "Winner takes most" disruptive novelty . there will be casualties. I will back the Winner with real investment and at the moment I cannot find an argument for any real competitive contender beyond Tesla.
Lucent make cars, Nuro and NVIDIA make bolt on bits . In Time they will overcome the Board crisis of Not inveneted here. Saudi PIF will ( maybe) keep providing money, so they may prevail but I'm not sure they have th eingediants to be that Winner which takes most.
I am curious about the motives of Forbes in their constant attempts to devalue Musk & Tesla, it is so intense at times they genuinely do compromise the value of the Forbes brand......WHY?
Add new comment